A Guide to Metal 3D Printing: From Technology to Best Practices

Struggling to produce complex metal parts that are too costly or impractical with traditional methods? Metal 3D printing offers a smarter, more efficient solution that can cut costs and accelerate innovation.

Metal 3D printing additively builds metal parts layer by layer from digital designs. It excels at creating intricate, low-volume components, offering new design freedoms and manufacturing possibilities.

Over the years at Allied Metal, we've seen manufacturing evolve at an incredible pace. We started with CNC machining, and that's still a huge part of what we do and love. But now, we've also embraced 3D printing and rapid prototyping, including working with metals. Metal 3D printing, or additive manufacturing, is a field that's really opening up new doors for engineers like David. My insight here is that metal 3D printing is ideal for producing complex, low-volume parts with intricate geometries that would be costly or impossible using traditional methods. It’s not a replacement for everything, of course. However, for high precision and cost-efficiency in larger runs, CNC machining often remains the better choice. Understanding when and how to use metal 3D printing is key to leveraging its power. Let's explore this exciting technology.

---

What Is Metal 3D Printing, and How Does It Differ?

You hear about 3D printing plastics, but what about metals? Is metal 3D printing just a stronger version, or a completely different ball game for manufacturing?

Metal 3D printing, or metal additive manufacturing, is a process that builds three-dimensional metal objects directly from a digital CAD model, layer by successive layer, often using metal powders.

Diving Deeper into the Concept of Metal 3D Printing

Metal 3D printing is a truly transformative technology. Unlike traditional subtractive manufacturing¹ (like CNC machining, where you start with a block of material and cut away what you don't need), metal 3D printing is an additive process. This means it builds parts from the ground up, adding material only where it's needed, one super-thin layer at a time.

Imagine constructing a complex sculpture with sand, but instead of just piling it, you're precisely placing and fusing tiny metal particles according to a digital blueprint. That's the essence of it. This layer-by-layer approach allows for the creation of incredibly complex internal features, organic shapes, and consolidated assemblies that would be extremely difficult, time-consuming, or downright impossible to make using older methods.

As my insight suggests, this is particularly powerful for parts with intricate geometries. For an engineer like David, this means greater design freedom. He can design parts optimized for function and weight, rather than being constrained by the limitations of traditional manufacturing tools. It also means we can produce functional metal prototypes or custom, low-volume end-use parts without the need for expensive tooling like molds or dies. It’s a shift in thinking from "how can I make this?" to "what is the best possible design for this function?"

---

How Does Metal 3D Printing Work?

Building metal parts layer by layer sounds futuristic, but how is it actually done? Understanding the basic principles and common methods sheds light on this advanced technology.

Metal 3D printing typically uses a high-energy source (laser or electron beam) to melt and fuse metal powder, or bind it for later sintering, layer by layer, based on a CAD model.

Diving Deeper into the Technologies

While there are several specific technologies under the umbrella of metal 3D printing, they all share the core principle of additive, layer-by-layer construction. Here are some of the most common processes an engineer like David might encounter:

1. Powder Bed Fusion (PBF)²: This is currently the most prevalent category for producing high-quality metal parts.

   • Selective Laser Melting (SLM) / Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS): These are very similar. A thin layer of fine metal powder is spread across a build platform. A high-power laser then selectively scans the powder bed, melting and fusing the particles together where the part needs to be solid. The platform lowers, a new layer of powder is spread, and the process repeats. DMLS typically sinters the powder without fully melting, while SLM fully melts it. I’ve seen parts made with these methods that have incredible detail.
   • Electron Beam Melting (EBM): Similar to SLM/DMLS, but uses an electron beam instead of a laser as the energy source. EBM operates in a vacuum and at higher temperatures, which can be beneficial for certain reactive materials like titanium, and can result in parts with lower residual stress.

2. Directed Energy Deposition (DED):

   • In DED, metal powder or wire is fed through a nozzle and melted by a laser, electron beam, or plasma arc as it's being deposited. The nozzle is often mounted on a multi-axis arm, allowing material to be added to existing parts for repair or to build features on complex surfaces. It's generally faster for larger parts but may have a rougher surface finish than PBF.

3. Binder Jetting (Metal):

   • This process involves selectively depositing a liquid binding agent onto a bed of metal powder, layer by layer, to form the part's shape. The "green" part is then removed from the powder bed and undergoes a sintering process in a furnace to fuse the metal particles together and achieve its final density and strength. This can be a faster and less expensive method for some applications, but the sintering step adds complexity and can cause shrinkage.

Each of these methods has its own advantages, preferred materials, and typical applications, impacting factors like resolution, surface finish, and mechanical properties of the final part.

---

Which Metals Are Actually Compatible with Metal 3D Printing?

Can any metal be 3D printed, or are there specific types that work best? Knowing the material options is crucial when considering this technology for your projects.

Common metals for 3D printing include stainless steels, aluminum alloys, titanium alloys, nickel superalloys, and tool steels. Material choice depends on the specific printing process and application requirements.

Diving Deeper into Printable Metal Materials

The range of metals that can be 3D printed is continually expanding, which is exciting for us at Allied Metal as we explore new possibilities for clients like David. However, not every metal or alloy is easily adaptable to current additive manufacturing processes. The suitability often depends on factors like the metal's ability to be produced as a fine, consistent powder (for PBF and binder jetting), its weldability (for laser/electron beam processes), and its behavior during rapid melting and solidification.

Here are some of the most commonly used metals in 3D printing today:

• Stainless Steels: Grades like 316L and 17-4 PH are very popular due to their good strength, excellent corrosion resistance, and relatively good processability. They're used in a wide range of industries, from medical to industrial components.
• Aluminum Alloys: Alloys like AlSi10Mg are widely used for their light weight, good strength-to-weight ratio, and thermal properties. They are common in aerospace, automotive, and for making lightweight fixtures or prototypes.
• Titanium Alloys: Ti6Al4V (Grade 5) is a workhorse titanium alloy in metal 3D printing. It offers exceptional strength-to-weight ratio, excellent corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility, making it ideal for aerospace components, medical implants, and high-performance parts.
• Nickel-Based Superalloys: Materials like Inconel 625, Inconel 718, and Hastelloy X are used for applications requiring high strength and resistance to extreme temperatures and corrosive environments, such as in gas turbines, rocket engines, and chemical processing equipment.
• Tool Steels: Grades such as H13, Maraging Steel (e.g., MS1), and some stainless tool steels can be 3D printed. This allows for the creation of complex tooling with features like conformal cooling channels, which can significantly improve performance and lifespan.
• Cobalt-Chrome Alloys: Often used for medical implants (like dental and orthopedic) and high-wear applications due to their strength, biocompatibility, and wear resistance.
• Copper and Copper Alloys: Pure copper and alloys like bronze are gaining traction for applications requiring high electrical or thermal conductivity, such as heat exchangers or electrical components.

The ongoing development in materials science is continuously broadening this list, making metal 3D printing even more versatile.

---

What Kind of Tolerances Can You Expect in 3D Printed Metal Components?

Precision is paramount in engineering. How accurate are metal 3D printed parts, and can they meet the tight tolerances often required in complex assemblies?

Tolerances for metal 3D printing vary by process and part size, typically ranging from ±0.1mm to ±0.5mm or more. Post-processing, like CNC machining, is often needed for critical dimensions.

Diving Deeper into Accuracy and Precision

This is a really important question for engineers like David, who regularly deal with stringent tolerance requirements for their components. While metal 3D printing can produce incredibly complex shapes, the "as-printed" tolerances are generally not as tight as those achievable with precision CNC machining.

Several factors influence the final accuracy of a metal 3D printed part:

• Printing Technology: Different processes have different inherent accuracies. Powder Bed Fusion (SLM, DMLS, EBM) tends to offer some of the best tolerances among metal AM methods.
• Machine Calibration³: The precision and calibration of the 3D printer itself are crucial.
• Material Properties: The specific metal being used and its behavior during melting, solidification, and cooling (e.g., shrinkage, warping) can affect dimensional accuracy.
• Part Size and Geometry: Larger parts or those with very delicate features might experience more significant deviations. Internal stresses built up during the layer-by-layer process can also lead to distortion.
• Build Orientation and Support Structures: How a part is oriented in the build chamber and where supports are placed can impact its final dimensions and surface quality.

Typical Tolerances:
As a general guideline, for Powder Bed Fusion processes, you might expect tolerances in the range of ±0.1 mm to ±0.2 mm (±0.004" to ±0.008") for smaller features, potentially increasing for larger dimensions or more complex parts. Some sources might quote general machine accuracy, but part accuracy will vary. For very large parts or less precise methods like DED, tolerances could be ±0.5 mm or greater.

The Role of Post-Processing:
Because of these factors, it's very common for metal 3D printed parts that require high precision to undergo secondary CNC machining operations on critical surfaces or features. This hybrid approach leverages the design freedom of 3D printing for the overall shape and the precision of CNC machining for tight tolerances. This is where a company like Allied Metal, with expertise in both, can provide a complete solution. My insight about CNC machining often being the better choice for high precision definitely applies here, often as a complementary finishing step.

---

What Are the Advantages and Challenges of Metal 3D Printing vs. Conventional Methods?

Metal 3D printing sounds revolutionary, but how does it stack up against tried-and-true manufacturing? Knowing its pros and cons helps determine its true value.

Advantages include complex geometry creation, part consolidation, and lightweighting. Challenges involve cost, build speed for high volumes, surface finish, size limits, and necessary post-processing.

Diving Deeper into the Pros and Cons

Metal 3D printing offers some game-changing capabilities, but it's not a universal solution. It's important for engineers like David to understand its strengths and weaknesses compared to conventional methods like CNC machining, casting, or forging.

Advantages of Metal 3D Printing:

1. Design Freedom & Complexity: This is a huge one. It can create intricate internal channels, organic shapes, and complex lattice structures that are impossible or prohibitively expensive with traditional methods. This directly supports my insight about its suitability for complex geometries.
2. Part Consolidation: Multiple components of an assembly can often be redesigned and printed as a single, integrated part, reducing assembly time, weight, and potential points of failure.
3. Lightweighting: Through topology optimization and the creation of internal voids or lattices, parts can be made significantly lighter while maintaining structural integrity.
4. Rapid Prototyping of Metal Parts: Functional metal prototypes can be produced quickly without the need for tooling.
5. Customization & Low-Volume Production: Ideal for one-off custom parts, patient-specific medical implants, or small production runs where tooling costs would be too high (again, aligning with my insight).
6. Reduced Material Waste (Potentially): Additive processes generally use only the material needed for the part and supports, which can lead to less waste than subtractive methods for certain complex parts.

Challenges of Metal 3D Printing:

1. Cost: Machines are expensive, metal powders can be costly, and skilled labor is required. Per-part cost can be high, especially for larger components or simpler geometries better suited for other methods.
2. Build Speed and Scalability: While great for prototypes and low volumes, current metal 3D printing technologies are generally slower than mass production methods like casting or high-speed CNC machining for large quantities.
3. Surface Finish: As-printed surfaces are often rougher than machined surfaces and may require significant post-processing (e.g., bead blasting, polishing, machining) to achieve desired smoothness.
4. Part Size Limitations: Build envelopes of metal 3D printers restrict the maximum size of a single part that can be produced.
5. Material Properties & Consistency: Achieving consistent, isotropic (uniform in all directions) mechanical properties can be challenging and requires careful process control and post-processing (like heat treatment).
6. Post-Processing Requirements: Parts almost always require post-processing, which can be extensive: stress relief, removal from the build plate, support structure removal, powder removal, surface finishing, and often precision machining of critical features.

Understanding this balance helps determine if metal 3D printing is the right fit for a particular project.

---

Is Metal 3D Printing Actually More Affordable Than CNC Machining?

Cost is always a factor. Is adopting metal 3D printing a way to save money compared to the established precision of CNC machining for metal parts?

Metal 3D printing can be more affordable for highly complex, low-volume parts or prototypes. CNC machining is typically more cost-effective for simpler geometries, higher volumes, and very tight tolerances.

Diving Deeper into the Cost Equation

This is a question I get asked a lot, and the answer is almost always: "it depends." There's no universal rule that says one is cheaper than the other. The cost-effectiveness of metal 3D printing versus CNC machining hinges on several critical factors.

When Metal 3D Printing Can Be More Affordable:

1. Highly Complex Geometries: My insight highlights this. If a part has intricate internal channels, complex organic shapes, or features that would require multiple complex setups and specialized tooling for CNC machining, 3D printing can be cheaper because complexity adds little to no extra cost to the printing process itself.
2. Very Low Volumes (Including One-Offs): For prototypes or producing just a few units, 3D printing avoids the upfront costs of CNC programming, fixture design, and tooling (though CNC programming can also be quick for simple parts).
3. Part Consolidation: If 3D printing allows you to combine multiple machined and assembled components into a single printed part, you save on assembly labor and individual part manufacturing costs.
4. Material Utilization for Expensive Materials: For some very expensive materials like certain titanium or nickel alloys, the near-net-shape capability of some 3D printing processes can reduce material waste compared to machining from a larger billet, potentially lowering material costs.

When CNC Machining is Typically More Affordable:

1. Simpler Geometries: For parts with relatively simple shapes (prismatic, turned features), CNC machining is usually much faster and cheaper per part.
2. Medium to High Production Volumes: Once you get beyond a certain volume, the per-part cost of CNC machining drops significantly, easily beating 3D printing. My insight about CNC remaining better for cost-efficiency in larger runs holds true.
3. Standard Materials: CNC machining works efficiently with a vast range of standard metal stocks that are often less expensive than specialized metal powders for 3D printing.
4. High Precision and Fine Surface Finish Requirements (Directly): If very tight tolerances and smooth surfaces are needed "out of the machine," CNC machining often delivers this more directly and affordably than 3D printing, which might require extensive post-machining.

For an engineer like David, the best approach is often to evaluate both methods for a given part, especially if it falls into a grey area of moderate complexity or volume. Sometimes, a hybrid approach—3D printing the basic complex shape and then CNC machining critical features—offers the best of both worlds.

---

How Do You Choose Between Metal 3D Printing and CNC Machining for Your Project?

Given their distinct strengths, how does an engineer decide which process is better suited for a specific metal component: additive manufacturing or traditional subtractive CNC?

Choose based on part complexity, production volume, material needs, required tolerances/finish, lead time, and overall cost. Often, complexity and low volume favor 3D printing; simplicity and high volume favor CNC.

Diving Deeper into the Decision Framework

For an engineer like David, who needs reliable manufacturing partners for custom components, deciding between metal 3D printing and CNC machining requires a careful assessment of the project's specific needs. My experience at Allied Metal, where we offer both, has shown that a few key questions can guide this decision:

1. What is the Part's Geometric Complexity?

   • High Complexity (internal channels, organic shapes, lattices, consolidated assemblies): Metal 3D printing excels here. As my insight suggests, it's ideal for these.
   • Moderate to Low Complexity (prismatic shapes, turned features, relatively simple profiles): CNC machining is often more efficient and cost-effective.

2. What is the Required Production Volume?

   • Prototypes & Very Low Volume (1-100 parts): Metal 3D printing can be very competitive, especially if complexity is high, as it avoids tooling costs.
   • Medium to High Volume (100s to 1000s+ parts): CNC machining generally becomes much more cost-effective per part due to faster cycle times and established efficiencies. This aligns with my insight about CNC for larger runs.

3. What are the Material Requirements?

   • Is the desired metal readily available and well-characterized for 3D printing processes? While the list is growing, CNC machining still offers a broader, more established range of standard engineering metals.
   • Are specific material certifications or properties (e.g., fatigue life, specific heat treatment response) critical and well-documented for the AM process?

4. What are the Tolerance and Surface Finish Requirements?

   • Very Tight Tolerances & Smooth Surface Finish Directly Needed: CNC machining typically provides superior results out-of-the-box.
   • Moderate Tolerances Acceptable, or Post-Machining is Planned: Metal 3D printing can be suitable, with CNC used for critical finishing. David's need for stringent tolerances often points to CNC for final features.

5. What is the Urgency (Lead Time)?

   • For one-off complex prototypes, metal 3D printing can sometimes deliver a part faster as it skips tooling. However, CNC programming for simpler parts can also be very quick, and actual print/machining times vary. Post-processing for 3D prints can also add significant time.

6. What is the Overall Budget?

   • Analyze the total cost, including material, machine time, labor, and any necessary post-processing for both methods.

Often, the "best" solution might even involve a hybrid approach. For example, 3D printing a near-net shape and then using CNC machining to achieve critical tolerances and surface finishes. This is where having a partner with expertise in both areas can be a real advantage.

---

Conclusion

Metal 3D printing excels for complex, low-volume parts, offering design freedom. CNC machining often leads in precision and cost for higher volumes. Choose based on specific project needs.

---